Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:04:48 -0230 (NDT)
From: David Pike
To: pike-dna-l@rootsweb.com
Subject: 3 new results, and other news
Hi everybody.
I've had an unusually heavy workload this term and have consequently
fallen a bit behind on a few things, including the regular pace of sending
out email updates about developments with our DNA project. With this
message I'll try to start to catch up a little bit.
The first news item to convey is not DNA related but instead is about a
Pike reunion that will be taking place on July 18-21 in and around
Salisbury, Massaschusetts. The reunion is not for members of any specific
Pike family, but is open to members and descendants of all Pike families.
For more information, contact Roy Escott Pike (who is President of the
Pike Family Association as well as being kit number 31483 in our DNA
project) at roypike36@msn.com
Next is some news from Family Tree DNA. In February they held a promotion
in which they offered their 12 marker Y-DNA test for an unprecedented $39.
Although it was advertised as being a temporary price, it now appears that
Family Tree DNA has adopted it as the regular price for their 12 marker
test. While our project will continue to recommend that people test at
least 37 markers, the attractiveness of a low cost test may enable more
people to take an initial step into the realm of genealogical DNA testing.
Indeed, our project has already been joined by some new members who have
taken advantage of this opportunity.
Okay, now for some new DNA results. Just before Christmas, Stephen
received the 37 marker results for his grandfather James (kit number
258895). James' grandfather Thomas Meredith PIKE was a major in the Royal
Irish Rifles. Thomas was born about 1848 in Dublin, Ireland, but all that
is currently known about his ancestry is that his father was named Thomas
and was deceased by 1876. James' DNA results are a clear match with the
members of our project's "Group 1" clan. Given the abundance of Pike
lineages in "Group 1" that trace their origins to the area of Hampshire,
Wiltshire and Berkshire in England, it now appears that Stephen's and
James' Pike line will ultimately be traced back to this region as well.
Kit 262519 (who is currently an anonymous participant in our project and
who hasn't yet provided pedigree details) also tested 37 markers. He
matched on 35 of the 37 markers with Harl (kit 179514) in our "Group 6"
and so it appears likely that 262519 descends from James and Naomi PIKE
who settled at Charlestown, Massachusetts in the 1640s.
Kit 262549 is also anonymous and has not yet provided details for his Pike
ancestry. He tested 67 markers but no close matches with other members of
our project were found. Based on the first 37 markers, his closest
matches are with Gary (kit 160783) and Donald (167453) in our "Group 16",
but 262549 is separated from each of Gary and Donald by 11 differences in
their DNA results, which is more than enough to exclude a close
relationship. For the timebeing 252549's results have been put into the
"Ungrouped Test Results" section of our Test Results webpage.
Let me close this message with a detailed update about the Genographic
Project that is operated by the National Geographic Society. Back in
November I mentioned that it had entered into a second phase in which it
was testing a large number of autosomal markers as well as some mtDNA and
Y-DNA markers too. All of the markers being tested are SNPs (single
nucleotide polymorphisms) whereas the Y-DNA markers that we use within the
Pike project are STRs (short tandem repeats). The utility of SNPs is
primarily with respect to deep ancestry (i.e., well before genealogical
times). With regard to Y-DNA SNPs, these are the basis for Y-DNA
Haplogroups (which are merely predicted from the standard STR markers).
I received my Geno 2.0 results in January. For my mtDNA, they have
identified that I belong to mtDNA Haplogroup T2b21. This is correct, and
is something that I already knew based on having had Family Tree DNA
previously do a full mtDNA test for me. On the Genographic website there
is an "Our Story" section that lets me see brief stories written by other
people who are in my haplogroup. So far it shows that there are a dozen
others in my haplogroup, but only one has evidently written a story yet,
so for now I have no idea who the other T2b21 folks in the Genographic
Project might be.
For my Y-DNA, they have identified that I belong to Y-DNA Haplogroup
R-Z253, which is one of many subgroups of Haplogroup R1b. This is correct
(again, I knew this already from some extensive testing that I have done
at Family Tree DNA). In fact I'm in a subgroup of R-Z253 called R-L554,
but the Genographic Project isn't yet showing this detail. It's all still
in "beta" mode though, so perhaps this will get adjusted later on, maybe
once some more people who are R-L554 come along. Currently the only
people who I know belong to Haplogroup R-L554 are the members of "Group 2"
in the Pike DNA Project, a fellow with the surname BROWN and another
fellow with the surname PERRY.
For my autosomal DNA, the "Who Am I" section on the Genographic website
provides an analysis for me. It says that my autosomal genetic makeup is
44% Northern European, 40% Mediterranean and 16% Southwest Asian. A few
reference populations are then listed for me, the first one being
"British" for which a typical person is evidently 49% Northern European,
33% Mediterranean and 17% Southwest Asian. My next best reference
population is "Iberian" for which a typical person is 37% Northern
European, 48% Mediterranean and 13% Southwest Asian. Based on what I
think I know of most of my ancestry, it makes sense that these would be my
two best reference populations.
Currently there is not much more autosomal analysis offered. For
instance, it does not yet show just which parts of my autosomal DNA might
be from which region, although this functionality might be added in the
future. Something they have shown are the amounts of Neanderthal and
Denisovan DNA that I carry... I measure 2.7% for both of them. They say
that most non-Africans are about 2% Neanderthal. No details are yet
available for what might be typical for Denisovan results.
- David.
|