Pike Surname DNA Project

DNA Test Results

Currently our project has 195 participants, 182 of whom have had Y-DNA results reported. Several (but not all) of these results can be collected together in one of the following different groups:

Pike Group     Haplogroup     Pike Group Description

   Group 1 : R1a Pikes from Hampshire and Wiltshire, England

   Group 2 : R1b Pikes of Carbonear, Newfoundland (previously from Poole, Dorset)

   Group 3 : R1b Relatives of Abraham Pyke of Baltimore, Maryland

   Group 4 : R1b Pikes from Nottingham, England

   Group 5 : I1 Pikes from St. Mary's County, Maryland

   Group 6 : R1b Relatives of James Pike of Charlestown and Reading, Massachusetts

   Group 7 : I1 Relatives of Philip Pike (who emigrated from Manchester, England to Kittery, Maine)

   Group 8 : I1 Pikes of Adair County, Kentucky; Edgefield County, South Carolina; and Roanoke, Alabama

   Group 9 : R1b Descendants of Wesley Pike and Olivia Drake

   Group 10 : R1b McPike, McPeak, and related surname variants

   Group 11 : J2 Pikes from Virginia

   Group 12 : R1a Pikes from Germany and Pennsylvania

   Group 13 : J2 Pikes from Pimperne, Dorset

   Group 14 : R1b Pikes from Truro, Massachusetts

   Group 15 : I1 Pikes from Headcorn, Kent

   Group 16 : R1b Relatives of Robert Pike who married Anny Anderson in 1781 at Fort Pitt, Pennsylvania

   Group 17 : R1b Pikes from Bristol (Gloucestershire), Glyncorrwg (Wales), Lyme Regis (Dorset), London and the Burin Peninsula of Newfoundland

   Group 18 : R1b Descendants of Hugh Pike of Newbury, Massachussets (including descendants of Rufus Pike of Franklin, New Hampshire)

   Group 19 : G Pikes from Eggesford and Salcombe Regis, Devon

   Group 20 : R1b Pikes from the vicinity of New Harbour, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland (possibly originating at Christchurch, Hampshire)

   Ungrouped Test Results

   Pending Test Results

Pike Group	Haplogroup	Pike Group Description
Group 1 :	R1a	Pikes from Hampshire and Wiltshire, England
Group 2 :	R1b	Pikes of Carbonear, Newfoundland (previously from Poole, Dorset)
Group 3 :	R1b	Relatives of Abraham Pyke of Baltimore, Maryland
Group 4 :	R1b	Pikes from Nottingham, England
Group 5 :	I1	Pikes from St. Mary's County, Maryland
Group 6 :	R1b	Relatives of James Pike of Charlestown and Reading, Massachusetts
Group 7 :	I1	Relatives of Philip Pike (who emigrated from Manchester, England to Kittery, Maine)
Group 8 :	I1	Pikes of Adair County, Kentucky; Edgefield County, South Carolina; and Roanoke, Alabama
Group 9 :	R1b	Descendants of Wesley Pike and Olivia Drake
Group 10 :	R1b	McPike, McPeak, and related surname variants
Group 11 :	J2	Pikes from Virginia
Group 12 :	R1a	Pikes from Germany and Pennsylvania
Group 13 :	J2	Pikes from Pimperne, Dorset
Group 14 :	R1b	Pikes from Truro, Massachusetts
Group 15 :	I1	Pikes from Headcorn, Kent
Group 16 :	R1b	Relatives of Robert Pike who married Anny Anderson in 1781 at Fort Pitt, Pennsylvania
Group 17 :	R1b	Pikes from Bristol (Gloucestershire), Glyncorrwg (Wales), Lyme Regis (Dorset), London and the Burin Peninsula of Newfoundland
Group 18 :	R1b	Descendants of Hugh Pike of Newbury, Massachussets (including descendants of Rufus Pike of Franklin, New Hampshire)
Group 19 :	G	Pikes from Eggesford and Salcombe Regis, Devon
Group 20 :	R1b	Pikes from the vicinity of New Harbour, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland (possibly originating at Christchurch, Hampshire)
Ungrouped Test Results
Pending Test Results

Globally, the number of genetically different (and therefore unrelated) Pike family lines found so far is at least 52.

The number of genetically distinct Pike family lines that we have so far witnessed in the British Isles is at least 24.

Pike DNA results for the British Isles are visually summarised with the following map, in which each pushpin colour represents a distinct Pike family group. Labels on some of the pushpins in the map correspond to the family Group numbers used elsewhere on this page. White pushpins with a question mark are for DNA tests that are currently in progress.

Map of Pike Lineages in the British Isles

For information on how to participate in the project, click here.

We currently have several targetted sponsorships available, although our project's current balance for general sponsorships is $166. To donate, click here, select the letter "P" from the first list, and then select "Pike" from the second list.

People who are curious about what else they might do with their test results might be interested in referring to this webpage.

The Pike Surname DNA Project is primarily using Y-DNA analysis to study paternal lineages, so the results of mitochondrial DNA testing are being reported on a separate "mtDNA Results" page.

Group 1: Pikes from Hampshire and Wiltshire, England

Approximately one quarter of the Pikes who have joined our project have been found to belong to one very large extended Pike family that dates back to sometime before 1600. Several of the family lines belonging to this group have been traced to Hampshire and Wiltshire [although there are other Pikes from Wiltshire who are not related to this group].

Of interest to some of our members with Irish roots, this group includes the renowned Quaker Pike family that held influence in Cork for several centuries.

Of interest to some of our American members, this group also includes Pikes who descend from John Pike who arrived in Massachusetts on 03 June 1635 (making him and his children the first documented Pikes in New England (at least to the best of our knowledge they were)). Note that Zebulon Montgomery Pike (1779-1813), who sighted Pikes Peak in Colorado in 1806, was a direct 4xgreat grandson of John and therefore would fit into this family group. Of the people presently in this group, several of them have traced their ancestry back to John, as illustrated in the following partial family tree. John had two sons, each of whom had three sons.

Each of the yellow squares in the figure below is for a participant of our DNA project. For reference, Zebulon Montgomery Pike has also been included in this partial family tree (he is represented by the blue square).

As can be seen in the above chart, many of the people in our "Group 1" are directly descended from John Pike who settled in Massachusetts in 1635. We are fortunate that John did not have just one son, but instead had two We have test results from descendants of each of John's two sons, which allows us figure out what most of John's marker values were most likely to have been. Doing this marker by marker, if a descendant of John's son John (such as Roy (31483)) and a descendant of John's other son Robert (such as Allen (33139)) have the same marker value, then it is most likely that this marker did not mutate in either line of descent, meaning that John also had this same value. For Roy and Allen, this is actually the case for each of the first 25 markers, so we can conclude that John most likely had these same marker values, which are displayed as the first "result" in the table of results presented a little further down this page.

Markers 26-37 are known to mutate at a slightly faster rate than markers 13-25 (which themselves tend to mutate more often than markers 1-12), so it's not terribly surprising that we see some genetic diversity among these markers. Still, for all but two of them, we can use matches among the results from descendants of both of John's sons to figure out what John's marker values probably were. The exceptions are for markers DYS-460 and DYS-CDY(b). In each of these cases we see that each of John's sons has descendants with different marker values, and so we are not yet able to determine John's values for these two particular markers.

The other participants in this group (who have no documented connection to John's family) lead us to some interesting discussion. For instance, several of them have a value of 24 for the marker DYS-390, yet among the known descendants of John we have only seen a value of 25. As yet we do not know how these people are related (but we know from the DNA results that they are related). One thing that is certain though is that some of the connections are very old. For instance, Jerry (74703) has Pike ancestry that goes back to a Richard Pike who was born in 1598. Jerry's Pike ancestors lived in Ireland from the early 1600s onwards, which means that his connection to John (who left England for Massachusetts in 1635) must be sometime in the 1500s or possibly even earlier.

The table below lists the full set of results for the people in "Group 1":

DYS Markers and Their Values

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111

Kit
Number Name
and
Pedigree Predicted
Haplogroup 3
9
3 3
9
0 3
9
4

* 3
9
1 3
8
5
(a) 3
8
5
(b) 4
2
6 3
8
8 4
3
9 3
8
9
(i) 3
9
2 3
8
9
(ii) 4
5
8 4
5
9
(a) 4
5
9
(b) 4
5
5 4
5
4 4
4
7 4
3
7 4
4
8 4
4
9 4
6
4
(a) 4
6
4
(b) 4
6
4
(c) 4
6
4
(d) 4
6
0 G
A
T
A
H4 Y
C
A
II
(a) Y
C
A
II
(b) 4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
C
D
Y
(a) C
D
Y
(b) 4
4
2
4
3
8
5
3
1
5
7
8
3
9
5
S1
(a)
3
9
5
S1
(b)
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
4
0
6
S1
5
1
1
4
2
5
4
1
3
(a)
4
1
3
(b)
5
5
7
5
9
4
4
3
6
4
9
0
5
3
4
4
5
0
4
4
4
4
8
1
5
2
0
4
4
6
6
1
7
5
6
8
4
8
7
5
7
2
6
4
0
4
9
2
5
6
5
7
1
0
4
8
5
6
3
2
4
9
5
5
4
0
7
1
4
7
1
6
7
1
7
5
0
5
5
5
6
5
4
9
5
8
9
5
2
2
4
9
4
5
3
3
6
3
6
5
7
5
6
3
8
4
6
2
4
5
2
4
4
5
G
A
T
A
A10
4
6
3
4
4
1
G
G
A
A
T
1B07 5
2
5
7
1
2
5
9
3
6
5
0
5
3
2
7
1
5
5
0
4
5
1
3
5
6
1
5
5
2
7
2
6
6
3
5
5
8
7
6
4
3
4
9
7
5
1
0
4
3
4
4
6
1
4
3
5

John R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

Descendants of John's son John:

31483 Roy R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 35 36 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

57262 Jeffrey R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 34 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 20 20 34 37 13 11

62105 Spencer R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33

75905 Gary R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33

120385 Eugene R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 34

120594 Alan  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 35 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13 32 15 9 15 12 26 27 19 11 11 13 12 10 9 12 11 10 11 11 31 12 14 24 13 9 10 19 15 18 12 24 15 12 16 24 12 24 19 10 15 19 9 11 11

129135 Larry  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 16 16 18 20 35 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13 32 15 9 15 12 26 27 19 11 11 13 12 10 9 12 11 10 11 11 31 12 13 24 13 9 10 19 15 18 12 24 15 12 16 24 12 24 19 10 15 19 9 11 11

S003 anonymous R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17

Descendants of John's son Robert:

28267 Earl R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

29676 Ronald R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33

30937 Dale R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 16 16 18 20 34 36 12 11

33139 Allen R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 16 16 18 20 34 36 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 24 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

48887 Ken & Karen R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 32

61276 Ed R1a 13 25 15 10 11 15 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17

70909 Roger  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 17 19 34 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13 32 15 9 15 12 26 27 19 11 12 13 12 10 9 12 11 10 11 11 31 12 14 24 13 9 10 19 15 19 12 23 16 12 16 24 12 24 19 11 15 19 9 11 11

93897 Richard In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done a genome-wide DNA test at 23andMe. Click on the 23andMe logo to go to the website for 23andMe. R1a 13 25 15 10 11 15 12 10 10 14 11 32 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

248028 Brenda/Robert R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 37 13 11

Members of Group 1 who have no documented connection to John...

... with 25 for the second marker:

60124 R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 33 12 14 14 17

61274 R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 13 11 32 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 33 12 14 14 17

74703 Jerry R1a 13 25 15 10 10 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 37 13 11

79012 Lori R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 32 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 38 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 10 11 14 13

80370 R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 17 20 32 39 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 12

117096 Gary R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 32

131446 Pam/Ross R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 38 13 11

144111 Richard R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 38 13 11

161346 R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 37 13 11

196644 Stephen R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 34 38 13 11

201971    In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1a 13 25 15 10 11 15 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 33 38 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 11 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 21 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13 33 15 9 15 12 26 27 19 12 12 13 12 10 9 12 11 10 11 11 31 12 14 24 13 9 10 19 15 20 12 24 15 12 16 24 12 24 19 10 15 18 9 11 11

258895 Stephen/James R1a 13 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 15 15 19 20 34 37 12 11

... with 24 for the second marker:

24697 Peggy/John  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 19 34 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

32721 David R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 13 11 32 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 16 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 19 34 37 13 11

50318 Roger R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 13 11 32 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 33 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

62921 James R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 16

121686 R1a 13 24 15 9 11 14 12 10 11 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 16

131559 R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 16 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 19 34 37 13 11

132584 Harry R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 16 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 19 35 37 13 11

209717 Bruce R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 32 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 34 12 14 14 17 11 11 19 23 16 16 19 19 34 37 13 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 11 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 22 12 12 11 13 11 11 14 13

N51451 Brian R1a 13 24 15 9 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33

212975 Thomas R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 33 12 14 14 17 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 20 33 37 13 11

251195 Stephen R1a 13 24 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 14 11 33 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 34 12 14 14 16 12 11 19 23 15 16 18 19 33 37 13 11

* DYS-394 is sometimes also called DYS-19.

Roy (31483) has had his Y-DNA Haplogroup confirmed to be R1a (M198+) and Larry (129135) has tested L664+. Full SNP results can be seen here.

Everybody who is in "Group 1" of the Pike project should likewise be in the L664 subgroup of Haplogroup R1a.

Group 2: Pikes of Carbonear, Newfoundland (previously from Poole, Dorset)

This group includes Pikes who have documented lineages that go back to the town of Carbonear, Newfoundland, as well as Pikes with matching DNA test results. Pikes have been in Carbonear since at least 1681 but the church records for the area don't start up until around 1800, so it is a daunting challenge to determine how/if the various Pikes of Newfoundland are related to one another. It is generally believed that the Pikes of Carbonear emigrated from Poole, Dorset.

In particular, Thomas Pike, a mariner of Poole, wrote a will in 1703 (click here to read a transcript of it) just prior to sailing to Newfoundland. Note also that Thomas bequeathed property in Newfoundland to his sons Thomas and John. Thomas jr lived at Poole but was a Newfoundland Planter and a Merchant by trade. It isn't now known where John lived, although at least some of his children had connections to Newfoundland as well. Some of John's descendants were known to be living in Gravesend, Kent in 1900 (if you descend from these Gravesend Pikes, please email David at dapike@mun.ca).

Incidentally, mariner Thomas died in 1704 and his son William became an apprentice at Portsmouth. William subsequently entered the brewing industry and became quite wealthy. William had two daughters who married into the Bonham and Carter families, several descendants of which now carry the compound "Bonham Carter" surname.

The following mini family tree shows what is known of the Pike lineages for some of the members of "Group 2". It is suspected (but not yet proved) that the great grandfather of Philip (kit 61275) is the same person as the great great grandfather of participant #72548.

It warrants noting that there may well be other Pike lines in Carbonear as well as elsewhere in Newfoundland that do not belong within "Group 2". For instance, there is a distinct Pike family on the Burin Peninsula (they belong to "Group 17"). It will take several more DNA tests from Newfoundland Pikes before we can see the full picture of which Newfoundland Pike lines are related and which are not. Some Pike family lines from the Carbonear area that are not yet represented in our project (as of March 2011) are:

descendants of Timothy & Patience Pike who moved from Carbonear to Channel between 1839 and 1842
descendants of James Pike & Elizabeth Ash who moved from Carbonear to Flat Islands, Bonavista Bay in the 1840s
descendants of Thomas & Margaret Pike who settled at Bonne Bay, but had previously lived at Harbour Grace in the 1850s
descendants of Christopher & Prudence Pike of Carbonear (their son Josiah moved to Barrington, Shelburne County, Nova Scotia in 1867 or 1868)
descendants of Samuel Pike (c.1782 - 1844) of Clowns Cove and/or Freshwater

If you descend from one of the families listed above, or from any other Pike family in Newfoundland, then please feel welcome to join the project.

Likewise, if you descend from Pikes at Poole or Portsmouth in England, we would be especially happy to have you in the project.

The Y-DNA markers for the members of "Group 2" are shown below:

David (23996) has had his Y-DNA Haplogroup confirmed to be in the subgroup of Haplogroup R1b that is defined by the L21 marker, and moreover is also in the subgroups of L21 that are defined by the Z253 and L554 markers. Full SNP results can be seen here.

Everybody who is in "Group 2" of the Pike project should likewise be in the L21, Z253 and L554 subgroups of Haplogroup R1b.

Group 3: Relatives of Abraham Pyke of Baltimore, Maryland

Abraham Pyke was born in either Pennsylvania or Maryland, sometime in the 1790s. His parentage is unclear, though it has been reported that he is the illegitimate son of a maid (whose identity is unknown) and an English businessman in Baltimore. Census records reveal that there was a Pyke living in Baltimore who could be Abraham's father (this man was also named Abraham; he was the owner of a cigar factory in Baltimore, and died on 2 April 1841).

Both Ralph (kit S001) and Faye's cousin (kit 48264) both descend from Abraham. Further, both are perfect matches with the very common 12-marker Western/Atlantic Modal Haplotype (WAMH).

The marker values listed for Ralph (kit S001) have some odd gaps because they were not provided by FamilyTreeDNA. In this case the genetic testing was done by the Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation, which does not test the same set of markers that FamilyTreeDNA does.

Group 4: Pikes from Nottingham, England

This group of Pikes has ancestry from Keyworth and Plumtree in Nottinghamshire. Included within this group are descendants of William Pike who settled in South Africa in 1820. An online family tree that suggests who several of William's ancestors were can be found here.

Group 5: Pikes from St. Mary's County, Maryland

In October/November 1633, the Ark and the Dove set sail with about 300 passengers (mostly Catholic) who had boarded at Gravesend (in Kent, east of London) and Cowes (on the Isle of Wight). Among them was a Robert Pike. The Ark and the Dove landed in what is now St. Mary's County, Maryland on or about New Year's Day (25 March) 1634.

William James Pike was born in St. Mary's County in the early 1760s. He moved to Kentucky, where he married Susannah Mills in 1791. William and Susannah had 10 children, including six sons (Nicholas, Joseph, John, Bernard, Ignatius, and Stephen). Currently we have two descendants of Joseph (namely Roger, with kit number 33184, and Kenneth (87449)) and also one descendant of Bernard (namely John, 61290) involved in our project, as shown in the partial family tree below.

As shown in the table below, each of their DNA results are a near perfect match.

Group 6: Relatives of James Pike of Charlestown and Reading, Massachusetts

James Pike arrived at Charlestown, Massachusetts in or before 1647. A very good reference for James' family is the book "Some Descendants of James Pike of Charlestown and Reading, Massachusetts and The Times in Which They Lived" written by Ruth G Pike in 1990. Quoting from page 2 of Ruth's book, she writes about James' time in Charlestown:

The earliest record placing him there is that of the birth of his firstborn: Spight, James, sonne of James Spight, borne 1 (11) 1646 (or by the revised calendar, 1 Jan. 1647).

By 1654 James had moved to Reading, Massachusetts, but is noted to still be a member of the Charlestown church as of 1683. James possibly had two wives, named Naomi and Sarah. James' five children were: James (born 1646 or 1647 in Charlestown), Jeremiah (likely born about 1649; no record of his birth is known), John (born 1653 in Reading), Zachariah (born 1658; lived to adulthood but seems to have not married), and Mary (no record of her birth is known).

As shown in the partial family tree depicted below, we currently have a small number of participants with paper-trail genealogies that go back to James. We've been puzzled by some of the DNA results from this group, largely because several of the initial 12-marker results appeared to not be genetic matches. For instance, Jean's cousin (61292) and Russell (83604) differ on 3 of their first 12 markers.

However, with the benefit of some upgrades, etc, it's now looking more as though Jean and Russell might just be at extreme ends of the spectrum of what's become of James' original genetic signature, now that it's had some 400 years of time to undergo mutations among his descendants. That Kevin (96201) has a 12-marker signature that is in between that of Jean and Russell helps to bridge the gap that first seemed to exist between them. So do other "in between" results from people who are stuck in their genealogies without establishing a connection to James (such as Karen, Stuart, and Ronald).

Nevertheless, there is still at least one mystery to be solved, since Gilbert (62731) has results that are sufficiently different from Jean and Russell that we can be confident that there is a genetic mismatch. This suggests that there may have been an error in somebody's genealogical reserach, or perhaps there has been an undocumented adoption in the family. However, since Gilbert does genetically match with Jesse (69482), if the cause for the mismatch is in Gilbert's ancestral line, then it would have happened long enough ago to also affect Jesse's Pike lineage.

Obtaining additional DNA results from other members of James' family will help to confirm and refine our understanding of the genetic relationships involved.

DYS Markers and Their Values

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67

Kit
Number Name
and
Pedigree Predicted
Haplogroup 3
9
3 3
9
0 3
9
4

* 3
9
1 3
8
5
(a) 3
8
5
(b) 4
2
6 3
8
8 4
3
9 3
8
9
(i) 3
9
2 3
8
9
(ii) 4
5
8 4
5
9
(a) 4
5
9
(b) 4
5
5 4
5
4 4
4
7 4
3
7 4
4
8 4
4
9 4
6
4
(a) 4
6
4
(b) 4
6
4
(c) 4
6
4
(d) 4
6
0 G
A
T
A
H4 Y
C
A
II
(a) Y
C
A
II
(b) 4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
C
D
Y
(a) C
D
Y
(b) 4
4
2
4
3
8
5
3
1
5
7
8
3
9
5
S1
(a)
3
9
5
S1
(b)
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
4
0
6
S1
5
1
1
4
2
5
4
1
3
(a)
4
1
3
(b)
5
5
7
5
9
4
4
3
6
4
9
0
5
3
4
4
5
0
4
4
4
4
8
1
5
2
0
4
4
6
6
1
7
5
6
8
4
8
7
5
7
2
6
4
0
4
9
2
5
6
5

Descendants of James' son James:

63479 Johnathan R1b 13 24 14 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 26 15 19 30 15 15 17 17

48191 Stuart  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done a genome-wide DNA test at 23andMe. Click on the 23andMe logo to go to the website for 23andMe. R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 17 36 37 12 12

83604 Russell  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done a genome-wide DNA test at 23andMe. Click on the 23andMe logo to go to the website for 23andMe. R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 15 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 17 36 37 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 19 23 16 11 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 15 11 11 13 12

211554 Todd R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 17 36 37 12 12

192797 James R1b 14 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 14 30

Descendants of James' son Jeremiah:

61289 R1b 13 25 14 12 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 30

61292 Jean R1b 13 25 14 12 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17

96201 Kevin R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30

131476 Gary R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 17 36 37 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 19 23 16 11 12 12 16 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 15 11 11 13 12

179514 Harl R1b 13 25 14 12 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 17 37 37 12 12

Descendants of James' son John:

62731 Gilbert/Maureen R1b 14 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 17 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 29 15 15 15 17 10 10 19 23 15 15 17 17 34 37 13 12

Matches that have no documented connection to James:

69482 Jesse R1b 14 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 17 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 29 15 15 15 17 10 10 19 23 15 15 17 17 35 38 13 12

274050 R1b 14 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 17 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 29 15 15 15 17 10 10 19 23 15 15 17 17 34 38 13 12

34964 Ronald R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17

61277 Karen  In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 15 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 17 36 37 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 19 23 16 11 12 12 14 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 15 11 11 13 12

78605 Larry & Margaret R1b 13 25 14 12 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 15 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 18 16 36 37 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 16 11 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 15 11 11 13 12

208614 John R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 10 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 19 18 36 37 12 12

N61704 R1b 13 25 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30

262519 R1b 13 25 14 10 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 28 15 17 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 20 17 37 37 12 12

* DYS-394 is sometimes also called DYS-19.

Group 7: Relatives of Philip Pike (who emigrated from Manchester, England to Kittery, Maine)

The earliest known ancestor for this group is Philip Pike who emigrated from Manchester, Lancashire to Kittery, Maine sometime in the late 1600s or very early in the 1700s (he was at Kittery by 1705).

A second branch of this family has been found in the southern USA, with its earliest known ancestor being a John Pike who was born in North Carolina but moved to Alabama.

As yet we do not know just how these two related family branches are connected to each other.

Group 8: Pikes of Adair County, Kentucky; Edgefield County, South Carolina; and Roanoke, Alabama

The origin of this Pike line remains something of a mystery to us. To date we have encountered a number of branches of this Pike family, but have not yet been able to figure out how they fit together into a family tree. The earliest known Pikes within this family cluster are:

Thomas Pike, who died in 1840 in Kentucky. Family lore says that Thomas came to the USA along with a brother named Preston, but this has yet to be confirmed. What is known is that Thomas was resident in Adair County by the time of the 1810 census, along with his wife and several children.
John Pike, born before 1775, and who died in Robertson County, Tennessee in 1824
William Pike who settled at Edgefield County, South Carolina in the mid 1700s

The William Pike who settled at Edgefield, South Carolina might have arrived there in 1754 on board the ship "Ruby". We are in search of more details that would help to verify this possibility. If anybody reading this has a copy of either of the following two books, would you please email David at dapike@mun.ca).

"Descendants of William Pyke / Pike and related families" written by Wilma Garrett McCutcheon (244 pages, published in 1999).
"William T. Pike, 1799-1882: South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and westward" written by John E. Pike (520 pages, published in 1996). Call Number: CS71.P636 1996.

Anybody with an interest in this family group is encouraged to get in touch with Carrie Olson at
She has done a large amount of genealogical work on this family and has also established a Facebook page for the Pike Family of South Carolina.

Group 9: Descendants of Wesley Pike and Olivia Drake

The 1840 census lists a Westley Pike (between 20 and 30) living at Fulton, Hamilton County, Ohio, along with a woman (age 20 to 30) and a girl (age 5 to 10).

The 1850 census lists the following family in Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio:

    Westey Pike        36 M    Ship Carpenter        born in Ohio
    Levi Pike          35 F                          born in Ohio
    F T Pike           15 F                          born in Ohio
    Hram Pike           9 M                          born in Ohio
    Martha Ann Pike     7 F                          born in Ohio
    Robert N Pike    9/12 M                          born in Ohio
    G R Pike            3 M                          born in Ohio

The 1860 census lists the following family in Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio:

    Wesley W Pike      48 M    Carpenter                    born in Ohio
    Alevia Pike        46 F                                 born in Ohio
    Hiram T Pike       19 M    apprentice to carpenter      born in Ohio
    Martha Ann Pike    17 F                                 born in Kentucky
    Robert N Pike      10 M                                 born in Kentucky
    Wilson B Pike       2 M                                 born in Kentucky

The 1870 census lists the following family in Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio:

    Pike Olivia        56 F    Seamstress      born in Ohio
    Pike Hiram         28 M    Caulker         born in Ohio
    Pike Martha        25 F    Seamstress      born in Kentucky
    Pike Robert        20 M    Laborer         born in Kentucky
    Pike Wilson        12 M    at school       born in Ohio
    Pike William        1 M    at home         born in Ohio

Group 10: McPike, McPeak, and related variants

Group 11: Pikes from Virginia

Group 12: Pikes from Germany and Pennsylvania

Group 13: Pikes from Pimperne, Dorset

Group 14: Pikes from Truro, Massachusetts

Group 15: Pikes from Headcorn, Kent

Group 16: Relatives of Robert Pike who married Anny Anderson in 1781 at Fort Pitt, Pennsylvania

Some details about Robert and Anny can be found on this webpage.

The location of Robert and Anny's marriage (Fort Pitt) has sometimes been referred to as Fort Wilkinson or Fort Wilkerson, likely in reference to the fort's commander, Col. Wilkinson.

Group 17: Pikes from Bristol (Gloucestershire), Glyncorrwg (Wales), Lyme Regis (Dorset), London and the Burin Peninsula of Newfoundland

Group 18: Descendants of Hugh Pike of Newbury, Massachussets
(including descendants of Rufus Pike of Franklin, New Hampshire)

Hugh Pike was born about 1657. In 1676 he was serving as a soldier under Captain Turner at Hatfield and Hadley, Massachusetts. In 1678, Hugh took an oath of allegiance at Newbury in 1678, at which time he was described as being aged 21.

Rufus Pike was born about 1812 at Franklin, New Hampshire, with his parents having been reported as James Pike (a great grandson of Hugh) and James' wife Alice George. However, Alice was born in 1756 and so would have been 56 years old at the time of Rufus' birth. This has led to suspicion that Rufus was actually the illegitimate son of one of James and Alice's daughters, which is consistent with the genetic mismatch that we are now able to see between DNA results from Greg (47429) and Ralph (197443). The pink circle in the mini family tree below denotes the mother of Rufus.

Group 19: Pikes from Eggesford and Salcombe Regis, Devon

Group 20: Pikes from the vicinity of New Harbour, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland (possibly originating at Christchurch, Hampshire)

Ernest (247419) has had his Y-DNA Haplogroup confirmed to be in the subgroup of Haplogroup R1b that is defined by the L21 marker. Full SNP results can be seen here.

Everybody who is in "Group 20" of the Pike project should likewise be in the L21 subgroup of Haplogroup R1b.

Ungrouped Test Results

Listed in the table below are all Pike results that match no other project participants. Also listed are participants for whom results are not yet available.

The table below contains the complete set of ungrouped test results, sorted according to their predicted haplogroup. Also included are rows for newcomers whose tests are currently in progress.

DYS Markers and Their Values

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111

Kit
Number Name
and
Pedigree Predicted
Haplogroup 3
9
3 3
9
0 3
9
4

* 3
9
1 3
8
5
(a) 3
8
5
(b) 4
2
6 3
8
8 4
3
9 3
8
9
(i) 3
9
2 3
8
9
(ii) 4
5
8 4
5
9
(a) 4
5
9
(b) 4
5
5 4
5
4 4
4
7 4
3
7 4
4
8 4
4
9 4
6
4
(a) 4
6
4
(b) 4
6
4
(c) 4
6
4
(d) 4
6
0 G
A
T
A
H4 Y
C
A
II
(a) Y
C
A
II
(b) 4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
C
D
Y
(a) C
D
Y
(b) 4
4
2
4
3
8
5
3
1
5
7
8
3
9
5
S1
(a)
3
9
5
S1
(b)
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
4
0
6
S1
5
1
1
4
2
5
4
1
3
(a)
4
1
3
(b)
5
5
7
5
9
4
4
3
6
4
9
0
5
3
4
4
5
0
4
4
4
4
8
1
5
2
0
4
4
6
6
1
7
5
6
8
4
8
7
5
7
2
6
4
0
4
9
2
5
6
5
7
1
0
4
8
5
6
3
2
4
9
5
5
4
0
7
1
4
7
1
6
7
1
7
5
0
5
5
5
6
5
4
9
5
8
9
5
2
2
4
9
4
5
3
3
6
3
6
5
7
5
6
3
8
4
6
2
4
5
2
4
4
5
G
A
T
A
A10
4
6
3
4
4
1
G
G
A
A
T
1B07 5
2
5
7
1
2
5
9
3
6
5
0
5
3
2
7
1
5
5
0
4
5
1
3
5
6
1
5
5
2
7
2
6
6
3
5
5
8
7
6
4
3
4
9
7
5
1
0
4
3
4
4
6
1
4
3
5

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup E:

A1944 Michell E1b1a 13 21 15 10 17 17 11 12 11 13 11 30 16 8 9 11 11 25 14 21 29 13 13 14 15 10 11 19 19 15 14 15 19 35 40 10 11

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup I:

52162 Jackie I 13 24 17 11 13 16 11 13 11 12 12 27 16 8 10 10 12 25 15 21 26 14 14 15 15 11 9 19 19 14 14 16 19 35 36 12 10

96341 Rex I 13 22 14 10 14 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 16 8 9 8 11 24 16 19 29 12 14 14 15 11 10 19 21 15 14 16 18 35 36 12 10

S002 James I 15 23 10 15 16 11 13 11 14 12 31 13 8 9 11 11 25 14 20 28 11 14 14 16 10 11 19 21 14 12 10 15 12

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup I1:

28606 Bryan In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done a genome-wide DNA test at 23andMe. Click on the 23andMe logo to go to the website for 23andMe. I1 13 22 14 10 12 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 14 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 14 15 16 10 9 19 21 14 14 17 18 35 38 12 10

111464 Carolyn I1 13 22 14 11 13 15 11 14 11 12 11 28 14 8 9 8 11 24 16 20 28 12 14 15 16 11 10 19 21 14 14 16 20 36 37 12 10

212280 Jean François I1 13 22 15 10 13 15 11 14 11 12 11 28 15 8 8 8 11 22 16 20 28 12 14 15 15 11 9 19 21 15 15 17 19 35 37 12 10

N23598 Jason I1 13 22 14 10 14 14 11 16 11 12 11 28 15 8 9 8 11 22 16 20 29 12 14 15 16 11 10 19 21 15 14 15 20 35 36 12 10 11 8 15 15 8 11 11 8 9 9 12 23 25 15 10 12 13 17 8 13 25 20 14 13 11 12 10 11 12 11

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup I2:

194314 Robert I2 14 22 15 10 16 18 11 13 11 13 12 30 17 9 9 11 11 25 15 20 28 11 14 15 15 11 10 19 21 13 16 17 18 32 38 12 10

N43252 Robert I2 13 23 17 10 14 16 11 13 12 13 12 29 15 8 9 11 11 26 15 20 28 11 13 16 16

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup J1:

172177 J1 12 25 14 10 16 16 11 16 10 13 13 29 16 8 9 11 11 26 14 20 29 13 14 14 17 11 9 19 22 17 14 19 18 31 36 12 11

E1943 Jamie J1 12 23 14 10 13 17 11 15 11 13 11 30 18 8 9 10 11 25 14 20 26 12 14 16 17 11 10 22 22 15 14 18 18 35 37 12 10

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup J2:

61273 Keith J2 12 24 15 10 13 17 11 16 12 12 11 28 15 8 9 11 11 28 16 19 29 15 15 18 18 11 10 19 20 13 14 16 17 32 40 12 9

93863 Dennis J2 12 23 14 10 14 17 11 17 11 12 11 28 18 9 9 11 11 26 14 21 30 12 13 15 15

268117 David J2 12 23 14 10 12 15 11 15 11 14 11 31 15 9 9 11 11 26 14 22 32 13 13 15 15 16 16 10 10 19 22 16 13 17 16 33 36 10 9

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup Q:

177549 Shelly Q 13 24 14 10 15 18 12 12 11 13 14 30 17 9 10 11 11 24 14 19 27 15 16 16 16 11 11 19 20 16 13 19 17 36 38 11 11

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup R1a:

32045 Margaret R1a 13 26 15 10 11 14 12 12 10 13 11 30 15 9 10 11 11 23 14 20 35 15 15 15 16 13 11 19 23 16 17 19 19 34 39 11 11

120005 Herbert R1a 15 25 15 10 11 14 12 10 10 13 11 30 15 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 32 13 13 14 17 12 11 19 23 14 15 17 20 32 39 12 11

137766 R1a 13 25 16 10 10 14 12 12 10 13 11 30 15 9 10 11 11 24 14 20 32 13 15 16 16 10 11 19 23 16 16 18 17 35 37 14 11 11 8 17 17 8 12 10 8 11 10 12 22 22 16 10 12 12 13 8 15 21 21 11 12 11 13 11 11 12 13

284861 Peter R1a 13 24 15 11 11 14 12 12 10 13 11 29 15 9 10 11 11 23 14 20 32 12 15 15 16 10 11 19 21 15 16 18 18 36 38 12 11

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup R1b:

10401 Roger R1b 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 16 19 30 14 14 16 18 11 11 19 23 17 15 18 18 37 40 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 16 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 13 12 34 15 9 16 12 25 26 19 12 11 13 12 10 9 11 11 10 11 11 30 12 13 24/td> 13 10 10 21 15 20 13 23 18 12 15 25 12 23 18 10 14 17 9 12 11

27712 Alan R1b 13 22 14 10 11 14 12 12 13 12 13 28

60440 Steven R1b 13 24 15 11 14 14 12 12 13 13 14 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17

80326 Kevin/Deb R1b 12 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 14 13 30 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 20 29 14 15 16 17

82804 Linda R1b 13 25 15 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 16 17 17 11 11 19 22 16 15 17 17 34 36 12 12

87894 anonymous R1b 13 24 14 10 12 14 13 12 12 13 15 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 16 17 17

131347 Wayne R1b 13 23 14 11 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 28 15 15 17 18 10 12 19 23 16 15 18 19 37 39 12 12

151034 R1b 13 23 14 10 9 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 24 15 19 30 15 15 17 18 11 11 19 21 15 14 16 17 33 37 13 12

166059 James R1b 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 17 9 9 11 11 24 15 18 29 15 15 16 17 11 11 19 22 16 14 19 17 36 38 12 12

186952 anonymous R1b 13 24 14 11 11 15 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 26 15 19 29 13 15 15 17 11 11 19 23 15 14 20 18 35 38 11 12

190144 R1b 13 23 14 11 12 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 19 9 10 11 11 23 15 19 29 16 16 17 19 10 10 19 23 16 15 18 18 36 40 13 12

208764 David R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 19 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 17 17 10 11 19 19 16 15 18 18 35 35 13 12

208808 Michael In addition to the Y-DNA markers shown here, this person (or a close relative) has done the genome-wide "Family Finder" DNA test at Family Tree DNA. Click on the Family Tree DNA logo to go to Family Tree DNA's webpage for "Family Finder". R1b 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 30 19 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 32 14 15 17 17 11 12 19 24 14 15 18 17 37 38 12 12 12 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 Null 22 23 16 11 12 12 15 8 11 22 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 12 12

230936 Anthony R1b 13 24 14 11 12 15 12 12 12 14 13 31 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 17 17 11 11 19 23 16 15 18 17 37 38 13 12

262549 R1b 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 9 11 11 24 15 19 29 15 15 16 17 10 11 19 23 16 16 17 16 37 37 11 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 15 9 12 12 14 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 13 12

N8337 R1b 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29

Ungrouped Results from Haplogroup T:

184460 Laurel T 13 24 16 10 13 15 11 12 11 12 14 27 16 9 9 11 13 25 14 20 34 10 12 16 16 10 10 23 23 16 15 17 17 37 38 11 9

* DYS-394 is sometimes also called DYS-19.

Pending Test Results

Listed in the table below are those kits that are yet to have their results completed.

Recently Received Test Results

Kit Number Markers Date Received

268117 1-12 13 February 2013

268117 13-25 14 February 2013

268117 25-37 14 February 2013

N113146 1-12 21 February 2013

N113146 13-25 18 April 2013

N113146 25-37 24 April 2013

271598 1-12 20 March 2013

271598 13-25 02 April 2013

271598 25-37 02 April 2013

274050 1-12 02 April 2013

274050 13-25 10 April 2013

274050 25-37 10 April 2013

279933 1-12 13 April 2013

279933 13-25 17 April 2013

279933 26-37 17 April 2013

280259 1-12 13 April 2013

280259 13-25 19 April 2013

280259 26-37 19 April 2013

273844 1-12 26 April 2013

273844 13-25 2 May 2013

273844 25-37 2 May 2013

284861 1-12 9 May 2013

284861 13-25 15 May 2013

284861 25-37 15 May 2013

Schedule for Pending Test Results

Below is a list of pending test results and estimates for when FamilyTreeDNA will have the results ready. Note that test results for individual DNA samples come out in stages, with the first 12 markers coming first. Also bear in mind that these dates are estimates. Sometimes results come in sooner, and sometimes it takes longer (especially if tests have to be re-run).

Kit Number Markers Estimated Date

210734 1-12 TBA

210734 13-25 TBA

210734 25-37 TBA

211751 1-12 TBA

211751 13-25 TBA

211751 25-37 TBA

252808 1-12 TBA

252808 13-25 TBA

252808 25-37 TBA

252808 38-67 TBA

261047 1-12 TBA

261047 13-25 TBA

261047 25-37 TBA

278643 1-12 28 June 2013

279743 1-12 21 June 2013

280053 1-12 TBA

Last Modified: Thursday, 16 May 2013, 10:26:16 NDT

Kit Number	Markers	Date Received
268117	1-12	13 February 2013
268117	13-25	14 February 2013
268117	25-37	14 February 2013
N113146	1-12	21 February 2013
N113146	13-25	18 April 2013
N113146	25-37	24 April 2013
271598	1-12	20 March 2013
271598	13-25	02 April 2013
271598	25-37	02 April 2013
274050	1-12	02 April 2013
274050	13-25	10 April 2013
274050	25-37	10 April 2013
279933	1-12	13 April 2013
279933	13-25	17 April 2013
279933	26-37	17 April 2013
280259	1-12	13 April 2013
280259	13-25	19 April 2013
280259	26-37	19 April 2013
273844	1-12	26 April 2013
273844	13-25	2 May 2013
273844	25-37	2 May 2013
284861	1-12	9 May 2013
284861	13-25	15 May 2013
284861	25-37	15 May 2013

Kit Number	Markers	Estimated Date
210734	1-12	TBA
210734	13-25	TBA
210734	25-37	TBA
211751	1-12	TBA
211751	13-25	TBA
211751	25-37	TBA
252808	1-12	TBA
252808	13-25	TBA
252808	25-37	TBA
252808	38-67	TBA
261047	1-12	TBA
261047	13-25	TBA
261047	25-37	TBA
278643	1-12	28 June 2013
279743	1-12	21 June 2013
280053	1-12	TBA