Curriculum Documents Relevant to Newfoundland and Labrador
An ideal K-6 math curriculum would have the property that essentially
all students completing that curriculum would have mastered the
topics necessary to complete the remainder of the school math
curriculum successfully and proceed to the post-secondary program
and/or the career of their choice. As many parents and
student in Newfoundland and Labrador will tell you, this was not
the case for their child and/or that student.
Is there such a curriculum?
The paper titled "A coherent curriculum," by Wm Schmidt and co-workers
presents solid evidence that such an A+ curriculum does, in fact, exist.
Would an A+ curriculum work in Newfoundland and Labrador?
The paper titled "A Quality Math Curriculum in Support of Effective
Teaching for Elementary Schools" answers this question in the affirmative.
Documents for Download
- A coherent curriculum, Wm Schmidt et al., is available
here.
- "A coherent curriculum" contains work by a research group
led by W. Schmidt at the
Education Policy Center
at Michigan State University. The paper analyses international test
data with the purpose of identifying effective math curricula. The result
is the A+ curriculum. The analysis also provides some of the answers as to
why North American children perform poorly in comparison to students
from other countries.
-
"A Quality Math Curriculum in Support of Effective
Teaching for Elementary Schools" by W. Hook, W. Bishop and J. Hook
can be found
here.
-
"A Quality Math Curriculum in Support of Effective
Teaching for Elementary Schools" describes the immediate positive
results achieved by adopting an A+ curriculum in California elementary
schools in 1998. It demonstrates that by making a change, the children
of Newfoundland and Labrador would reap tremendous benefits.
-
The Singapore K-6 curriculum documents from 2007 are available
here and
page 101
from the NL Grade 4 curriculum guide for comparison.
-
Singapore is one of the high performing countries identified by Schmidt's
group. Their K-6 curriculum is therefore an example of an A+ curriculum.
The document is well written and accessible to all. It states clearly what
should be taught when and what should be avoided. I strongly recommend it
to readers of this website. Singapore documents here and elsewhere
were obtained from the Singapore Ministry of Education website.
The page from the NL Grade 4 Guide illustrates the "mile wide inch
deep" descriptor. The NL Grade 4 Guide is over 250 pages; The Singapore
K-6 Guide is 40.
The Singapore secondary curriculum documents from 2007 are available
here for readers who
want to see the continuation.
- "A Critique of the Structure of U.S. Elementary School Mathematics"
by Liping Ma can be found
here.
- "This paper contains another example of an A+ curriculum together
with a clear explanation of why A+ curricula are so effective. It
compares this A+ curriculum with the "strand" type curricula common in
the U.S. and Canada and explains why "strand" curricula are ineffective.
- "Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work:
An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based,
Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching" by the eminent cognitive scientists,
Paul Kirschner, John Sweller and Richard Clark can be found
here.
-
The paper explains, based on our current
understanding of what it means to learn in terms of brain function, why
novice learners need substantial guidance to succeed. Further, it explains why
novice learners may know less after being exposed to unguided learning. We
strongly recommend that anyone with an interest in K-6 math curricula read this
paper.
More Information on Curriculum
Readers interested in exploring curriculum issues,
teacher training, test data, and related matters further can go
here.