As a mathematician, I am frequently asked to explain
what mathematical research is. Despite the widespread
applications of technology in our everyday
lives, nobody ever sees an equation when checking the weather
channel or turning on a cell phone. Even people who have
studied mathematics in university while pursuing a degree in
science or engineering may still look upon mathematics as a
collection of computational techniques. These are, of course,
an integral part of mathematics. But they represent the tip of
the iceberg, while the ballast is provided by a huge body of
understanding that remains hidden beneath the surface from
non-practitioners. The reality is that mathematics provides the
framework for understanding almost any complicated phenomenon.
Some mathematicians work directly on these interactions
with other fields, but many others pursue problems
without any direct application in mind. It is often the latter
pursuits which paradoxically may have the greatest impact in
the long run.
It is difficult to identify any item produced by modern industry where mathematics did not play a crucial role somewhere along the line. In manufacturing, advanced mathematical techniques are used to model and test products on computers, to visualize design, to control robots, and to optimize production techniques. The computer itself was conceived (and early working models built) by mathematicians. Interpretations of hidden structure are made possible by the measurement of reflected waves—from MRIs to earthquakes—to locate brain tumours, to find oil, and to detect planets around distant suns. All of this was developed from mathematics which had its roots three hundred years ago. Along the way, the study moved from a simple physical situation deep into mathematical abstraction and back out to physics again.
Most computer and cell phone equipment uses mathematical techniques for encryption, not just for security but also for data compression and for ensured accuracy of transmission. The world telephone network requires extremely sophisticated algorithms to route with speed and efficiency millions of signals simultaneously, without the users’ awareness.
Statistics is an indispensable tool in business, science, and
even public policy. Indeed, we are inundated with statistics
daily in the news. How do we actually know that 46.7 per cent
of Canadians support the federal Liberal party?—did they ask
you? Biologists are trying to understand the human genome
with thirty thousand genes and potentially nine billion pairs of
protein interactions as a result. They produce huge quantities
of data that are meaningless until analysed by statistical
methods. The banking and insurance industries rely on mathematics
and statistics to evaluate risk, to make actuarial assessments
of mortality, and to maintain proper cash reserves.
Mathematics has been called “the language of science.” This is not just a matter of vocabulary. Most complicated physical phenomena follow rather simple principles, generally expressed in precise mathematical formulas. What mathematics does for science is not just shorthand-—it is a very different way of looking at and thinking about the problem. Indeed the mathematization of a “real” problem generally involves abstracting out general structures. Any pesky details such as actual measurements may be replaced by arbitrary constants. In this way, whole families of related problems are considered simultaneously, with the original problem merely a single instance.
At this point, the mathematics can take on a life of its own.
Mathematicians may attack the problem by making simplifying
assumptions that alter the original problem. In solving this
simpler problem, they may identify important properties that
can be measured and which yield key information about the
whole system. These ideas then feed back into the larger context.
Predictions from both the behaviour in the simpler theoretical
models and from computational experiments in the
more complicated situations lead mathematicians to make
conjectures about the general case. Some such conjectures are
so incisive and their solutions have such profound implications
that they become world-famous problems. And eventually
someone solves them! Frequently, many years after the
original problem made its way from the real world to the symbolic
world of mathematics, the answer comes back and causes
a revolution in thinking.
Equally important but more subtle, mathematics can often tell you that something is impossible. When most people say that something is impossible, they mean that, in their experience, it cannot be done and, further, they cannot imagine how it might be accomplished. (Most modern technology was in that category not so long ago.) You are always left with the nagging feeling that perhaps you are just not smart enough. But a mathematician can often say with absolute certainty that something cannot be done, not just with today’s resources, but even with unimagined advances. Better yet, one can often identify an obstruction—a quantifiable measurement that calculates when one can do something and when one cannot. For example, a torus (doughnut) cannot be smoothly deformed into a sphere.
Finally, in a perverse turn of the screw, sometimes in
attempting to show that a certain property is an obstruction,
you find out that it is not! Overcoming this obstacle in its
simplest instance can often lead to a solution in great generality.
Most mathematicians have a strong aesthetic sense of
what good mathematics is. We distinguish a clean elegant
argument from a grungy brute force approach, and we distinguish
deep insights from routine extensions of old ideas. Some
difficult new ideas arrive fully polished, but usually it is a
messier business. The first breakthrough is a rough diamond.
Full understanding often comes later, as others analyse the new
technique, simplify, generalize, and polish it. Certain aspects
hidden in a clever but opaque argument may be exposed
and clarified. Over time, some results prove to be of central
importance while others fall by the wayside, correct but of
little lasting interest. Eventually the synthesis ends up in a
textbook and becomes part of the standard lore of practitioners
as well as experts.
People see advances in technology every day. Engineering
and drug companies get most of the credit. Behind the scenes,
you may envisage an engineer doing wind tunnel experiments
or a biologist identifying the gene that controls breast
cancer. But it is not easy to see how a mathematician who can
classify “finite simple groups” fits into the picture. Indeed,
I would find it difficult just to explain what a “simple group”
is to a non-mathematician, yet the classification of such groups
is a major achievement of twentieth-century mathematics.
Since technology is advancing rapidly, turning ideas from science into useful products, you might believe that the best use of resources is to pour funds into that transition. In fact, this last step is both the best funded and least scientific. Many entrepreneurs, from basement inventors to multinational companies, put a lot of effort into producing technology for profit. But while real problems are overcome at this level, they are usually of an incremental nature.
Fundamental advances in science often occur unexpectedly. Of course, scientists expect to make advances, and are generally driven by long-term goals of understanding. Every once in a while, however, scientists are in exactly the right place at the right time. Then their experience and knowledge enable them to recognize and develop the fortuitous insight. Trying to predict in advance which investigations will produce important applications is not only futile but also dangerous. Both scientists and policy makers have a consistently bad record of charting the important areas of future development. Funding the most promising application instead of the most promising scientist chooses good public relations over good science.
Mathematics is often remote from the big payoff of a saleable product. Increasingly, however, sophisticated ideas from mathematics—whether new or old—play a critical role in all of science and engineering. The theoretical advances of today feed the practical advances of tomorrow. Moreover, mathematics is relatively cheap! There are no big labs, no cyclotrons, or gene sequencers, or xray spectrographs. Mathematicians travel with their ideas in their heads, with pencils, paper, and of course, computers. Contrary to popular mythology, mathematicians are very sociable; they love to talk about their mathematics (to other mathematicians, of course). If you bring together a group of talented mathematicians interested in a common problem, a lot will happen. A number of international mathematics institutes such the Fields Institute in Toronto have been established specifically to facilitate this kind of interaction. We seek out opportunities in any area of mathematical science where there is promising activity.
Mathematics is a living breathing growing subject. It is
the fuel for science and technology. At work for the most
part behind the scenes, mathematics makes it possible to
understand the world we live in.
Director, Fields Institute